One of my biggest sins in either life is that I’m pretty much thinking about one thing or another. Churn, churn, churning about this or that. There are myriad reason why I do it, of course. Part of it has to do with how I’m wired, but there is also part of it where I yearn to understand things that aren’t making sense to me. The good and bad thing about Second Life for someone like me is that there is so much that doesn’t make immediate sense. While Linden Lab has often been nonsensical in some of its actions in the past couple of years, I couldn’t escape the intuitive sense that there was some huge disconnect occurring but I was having a hard time wrapping it into a pretty package that made sense to me. Between the fodder from Philip Rosedale’s recent town hall meeting and the SL blogosphere, my brain has been churning overtime and just maybe I’m starting to get an idea of that missing piece that I haven’t been able to put my finger on the past months. So what is it, Lanna? What seems to be Second Life’s missing link? Read on after the jump to find out..
Archive for the ‘Navel Gazing’ Category
I’ve always had a weakness for two things: suggestion and potential. They’re related, of course; bound by a latent promise of something better. To me, suggestion is the journey ahead, filled with endless routes and possible destinations. While potential is the engine you take down these tracks, hoping that it is sound enough and has enough fuel to get you there. My favorite sorts of suggestions, of course, are ideas; I’m seduced by ideas. Whisper something in my ear, and I’m guaranteed to think about it. And as far as potential? Let’s just say that I’ve bought the American cultural ethos that we can make ourselves into whomever we want hook, line and sinker.
Which brings me to this post. For almost three years, with the exception of a few breaks, a large part of my Second Life has been all about suggestion and potential. I’ve been fascinated by ideas like avatar identity, communities in virtual worlds, and the ways we could use virtual worlds as a important tools. These ideas still resonate powerfully with me, but it also feels as if something has happened in the past few months. In short, the suggestion and possibilities that had captured my imagination feels stale. It may well be me, that it feels like the same familiar ground has been walked upon over and over. (This isn’t entirely true, Grace McDunnough has recently fostered some wonderful dialogue on the concept of culture in Second Life. These important conversations, however, seem by nature to be more about defining what *is* versus what *could be.*)
Intuitively, I can’t help but feel as if Second Life is entering some sort of transitional state. Transitioning to what seems to be the question of the month. My crystal ball is a little hazy on this point, I can’t seem to get a good sense of all the possible directions yet. But my question is this, what do you see the new ideas of virtual worlds becoming? Will they be more nuanced versions of existing ones? Or new ones altogether? So what is it, dear reader, what suggestions and potential of Second Life have grabbed you lately?
I’m trying something new. Most of the time when I’ve blogged, I’ve labored over my posts, wanting them to be just so. This post, however, I’m giving myself only half an hour to write it; just getting my thoughts down and posting it for the world to see. I’m giving this a try because my schedule isn’t giving me much time and I want to see if I can post something without making it an arduous process.
This morning I read a wonderful post by my friend Chestnut Rau that included some of her perspective on trust in SL. As I read it, one of her key points was that trusting people enough to regularly let them in was something that didn’t come naturally to her. I couldn’t help but read that and think about my own journeys of trust and intimacy in the virtual world.
Initially I likened the intimacy that comes with pseudonymity in SL to meeting a stranger on a plane. You sit next to someone, exchange pleasantries, and sometimes you find a surprising conversation where people are divulging all sorts of details about themselves that you would have never imagined. Then you get off the plane and never see each other again.
My first experiences in Second Life were similar to this; I met wonderful people and shared surprising nuggets of myself. But then some funny things happened; I found that I got quite good at being an intimacy junkie, looking for a fix that comes with sharing something deep with other people. I coupled this, however, with a unique ability to keep many people at an arm’s length that comes with having a virtual identity. I found pseudononymous intimacy to be powerful but it was tempered by my own anxieties about too closely linking the atomic and digital worlds. Yet as time wore on, like any junkie, I found the fix got harder and harder to satisfy. I found myself getting less satisfaction from virtual intimacy and decided to start trusting and let down the veil of pseudonymity.
The gist of all this? I’m not exactly like the people on the old American Express ads, but I have gotten to know quite a few people. Yet like our first lives, we recognize that a much smaller circle of people are worthy of trust. I’m glad I decided to trust people and move toward a deeper and more genuine intimacy. The experience has undoubtedly made both my first and second lives richer.
But what is it for you, dear reader, have you found people you could trust to share intimately all of yourself in Second Life?
Last week on Plurk, Daila Holder posted “Blog Post Topics I’d Like to Read.” Some of them were really pretty funny, Confessions of a Male Fashion Blogger’s Girlfriend and I Saw You Naked and Now I Only Want to IM. On the whole, it seemed that the list would make for very interesting blog posts (I’d post a link to the plurk, but her timeline is set to private.) But there was one that got me thinking, Why I Alt. So I thought, it is an interesting topic, why not give it a go?
Alting is one of those interesting Second Life anomalies; most people do it, but few admit to it. If I had to guess, I would say that easily 85% of regular SL users that have been in-world for more than six months have at least one alt. Maybe people don’t talk about it because Linden Lab wants you to pay for additional avatars. Maybe they are quiet about it because people often use alts to do things they wouldn’t want to admit to publicly. Or maybe people don’t talk about it because they use it as a clean slate. Whatever the reason, people seldom discuss their alts.
But what about you, Lanna? Are you going to talk about why you alt? Yes! And if you’re that curious about it, look after the jump to find out!
No, this post isn’t an homage to that musical supergroup Three Times One Minus One, but about how we keep our first and second lives together. People come and go from Second Life all the time; it is simply the way things go in a pseudonymous virtual world. (Which I blogged about before here.) To be sure, the reasons people leave are many. Things get too busy in their first life. They get bored of their second life. The list of reasons goes on and on and on. Yet despite what people cite as a specific reason, I have noticed one theme among a group of departures upon which I can make a generalization. There are exceptions, of course, and it doesn’t cover all people leaving SL but it does address a large group of departures. Here’s the general trend that I’ve noticed:
“The lifespan of an avatar is inversely proportionate to the distance one keeps from their first life.”
Or, more simply put, the more people have to work to keep their first and second lives separate, the shorter their second life. No, I’m not talking about people who don’t divulge their first life name, because that is probably 90% of SL Residents. I’m talking more about the avatars who avoid acknowledging that they even have a first life. If you’ve been around SL, I’m sure you’ve met the type; these are people that avoid sharing they had awful day at work for fear that someone might ask them what they do. This is more about being so cautious that the person refuses to share contextual information as friendships develop. Half the people in SL have something to the effect of “SL is SL and RL is RL” in their profiles, but I would venture to guess that the majority of them share some of their RL with people they’ve grown to trust.
But this doesn’t just apply to keeping your first life secret in your second, but also applies to people hiding their second life from their first. I tend to think that this is actually a larger group. This is the people keeping their entire experience in Second Life secret from their spouse or partner. Working hard to keep things hidden requires effort and psychic energy that eventually takes its toll. Or, as one friend who left put it, “I just couldn’t keep lying all the time.”
Let’s be clear, I’m not judging here; at various points in my Second Life experiences, I’ve worked hard to keep them both separate. While Second Life allows us to explore boundaries, create and do things that we might not be able to do in the atomic world, we really only have one life to live. More accurately, I think it is often a process of realization that to maintain it all, one must find ways to be comfortable integrating all of these experiences together or risk burning out.
I would love to hear your two cents on this. Do you feel you had to find a way to integrate all these aspects of your life? Or, for those of you who work to keep them apart, has it felt challenging to do so as time passes?